One does not have to formally learn psycology to try and come a little close to understanding human nature. There was an interesting comment the other day.
Lets name the person as X. So the X was lamenting the fact that another human being , lets call him Y, is hot headed, dominating, and not at all capable, intelligent, articulate, or educated, wellread etc, etc ....
X says, "He has such limited intelligence, and yet look how angry he gets!!"
Now i believe X to be the better person, and yes, Y should treat him with more deference, but if that were the case, imagine how much power will go to the intelligent few and so little to the masses.
Will that not be an intellectual version of the jungle law?


I have just been told that this piece of writing is incomprehensible. Is it the idea , the style or the language? Do let me know.